-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15.2k
[RISCV] Add lowerVECTOR_SHUFFLEAsCONCAT_VECTORS. #109948
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-risc-v Author: Han-Kuan Chen (HanKuanChen) ChangesFull diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109948.diff 2 Files Affected:
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVISelLowering.cpp b/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVISelLowering.cpp
index bf822eb2c6eeb5..fe14b1991d5da2 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVISelLowering.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVISelLowering.cpp
@@ -5130,6 +5130,40 @@ static SDValue lowerVECTOR_SHUFFLEAsRotate(ShuffleVectorSDNode *SVN,
return DAG.getBitcast(VT, Rotate);
}
+// e.g.,
+// t10 = insert_subvector undef:v16i32, t4, Constant:i64<0>
+// vector_shuffle<0,1,2,3,0,1,2,3,0,1,2,3,0,1,2,3> t10, undef:v16i32
+// ->
+// concat_vectors t4, t4, t4, t4
+static SDValue
+lowerVECTOR_SHUFFLEAsCONCAT_VECTORS(ShuffleVectorSDNode *SVN, SelectionDAG &DAG,
+ const RISCVSubtarget &Subtarget) {
+ assert(SVN->getOperand(1).isUndef());
+ SDValue V1 = SVN->getOperand(0);
+ if (V1.getOpcode() != ISD::INSERT_SUBVECTOR)
+ return SDValue();
+ if (!V1.getOperand(0).isUndef())
+ return SDValue();
+ SDValue InsertValue = V1.getOperand(1);
+ MVT SubVecVT = InsertValue.getSimpleValueType();
+ unsigned SubVecNumElements = SubVecVT.getVectorNumElements();
+ uint64_t InsertIndex = cast<ConstantSDNode>(V1.getOperand(2))->getZExtValue();
+ if (InsertIndex != 0)
+ return SDValue();
+ ArrayRef<int> Mask = SVN->getMask();
+ if (Mask.size() % SubVecNumElements != 0)
+ return SDValue();
+ SmallVector<int> RepeatedPattern(
+ createSequentialMask(0, SubVecNumElements, 0));
+ // Check the Mask repeatedly uses the same subvector.
+ for (unsigned I = 0; I != Mask.size(); I += SubVecNumElements)
+ if (!Mask.slice(I, SubVecNumElements).equals(RepeatedPattern))
+ return SDValue();
+ SDLoc DL(SVN);
+ SmallVector<SDValue> Ops(Mask.size() / SubVecNumElements, InsertValue);
+ return DAG.getNode(ISD::CONCAT_VECTORS, DL, SVN->getSimpleValueType(0), Ops);
+}
+
// If compiling with an exactly known VLEN, see if we can split a
// shuffle on m2 or larger into a small number of m1 sized shuffles
// which write each destination registers exactly once.
@@ -5432,6 +5466,9 @@ static SDValue lowerVECTOR_SHUFFLE(SDValue Op, SelectionDAG &DAG,
if (SDValue V = lowerVECTOR_SHUFFLEAsRotate(SVN, DAG, Subtarget))
return V;
+ if (SDValue V = lowerVECTOR_SHUFFLEAsCONCAT_VECTORS(SVN, DAG, Subtarget))
+ return V;
+
if (VT.getScalarSizeInBits() == 8 &&
any_of(Mask, [&](const auto &Idx) { return Idx > 255; })) {
// On such a vector we're unable to use i8 as the index type.
diff --git a/llvm/test/CodeGen/RISCV/rvv/fixed-vectors-shuffle-concat-vectors.ll b/llvm/test/CodeGen/RISCV/rvv/fixed-vectors-shuffle-concat-vectors.ll
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000000..e3a790afeb41dd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/llvm/test/CodeGen/RISCV/rvv/fixed-vectors-shuffle-concat-vectors.ll
@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
+; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_llc_test_checks.py
+; RUN: llc -mtriple riscv64 -mattr=+v -riscv-v-vector-bits-min=512 -verify-machineinstrs < %s | FileCheck %s
+
+define <16 x float> @test1(<8 x float> %0) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: test1:
+; CHECK: # %bb.0: # %entry
+; CHECK-NEXT: vmv1r.v v9, v8
+; CHECK-NEXT: vsetivli zero, 16, e32, m1, ta, ma
+; CHECK-NEXT: vslideup.vi v9, v8, 8
+; CHECK-NEXT: vmv.v.v v8, v9
+; CHECK-NEXT: ret
+entry:
+ %1 = call <16 x float> @llvm.vector.insert.v16f32.v8f32(<16 x float> poison, <8 x float> poison, i64 8)
+ %2 = call <16 x float> @llvm.vector.insert.v16f32.v8f32(<16 x float> %1, <8 x float> %0, i64 0)
+ %3 = shufflevector <16 x float> %2, <16 x float> poison, <16 x i32> <i32 0, i32 1, i32 2, i32 3, i32 4, i32 5, i32 6, i32 7, i32 0, i32 1, i32 2, i32 3, i32 4, i32 5, i32 6, i32 7>
+ ret <16 x float> %3
+}
+
+define <16 x i32> @test2(<4 x i32> %0) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: test2:
+; CHECK: # %bb.0: # %entry
+; CHECK-NEXT: vmv1r.v v9, v8
+; CHECK-NEXT: vsetivli zero, 8, e32, mf2, ta, ma
+; CHECK-NEXT: vslideup.vi v9, v8, 4
+; CHECK-NEXT: vmv1r.v v8, v9
+; CHECK-NEXT: vsetivli zero, 16, e32, m1, ta, ma
+; CHECK-NEXT: vslideup.vi v8, v9, 8
+; CHECK-NEXT: ret
+entry:
+ %1 = call <16 x i32> @llvm.vector.insert.v16i32.v4i32(<16 x i32> poison, <4 x i32> poison, i64 4)
+ %2 = call <16 x i32> @llvm.vector.insert.v16i32.v4i32(<16 x i32> %1, <4 x i32> poison, i64 8)
+ %3 = call <16 x i32> @llvm.vector.insert.v16i32.v4i32(<16 x i32> %2, <4 x i32> poison, i64 12)
+ %4 = call <16 x i32> @llvm.vector.insert.v16i32.v4i32(<16 x i32> %3, <4 x i32> %0, i64 0)
+ %5 = shufflevector <16 x i32> %4, <16 x i32> poison, <16 x i32> <i32 0, i32 1, i32 2, i32 3, i32 0, i32 1, i32 2, i32 3, i32 0, i32 1, i32 2, i32 3, i32 0, i32 1, i32 2, i32 3>
+ ret <16 x i32> %5
+}
|
| %1 = call <16 x float> @llvm.vector.insert.v16f32.v8f32(<16 x float> poison, <8 x float> poison, i64 8) | ||
| %2 = call <16 x float> @llvm.vector.insert.v16f32.v8f32(<16 x float> %1, <8 x float> %0, i64 0) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Does inserting a poison subvector into a posion vector do anything?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actually it does nothing. Remove it already.
| SDValue InsertValue = V1.getOperand(1); | ||
| MVT SubVecVT = InsertValue.getSimpleValueType(); | ||
| unsigned SubVecNumElements = SubVecVT.getVectorNumElements(); | ||
| uint64_t InsertIndex = cast<ConstantSDNode>(V1.getOperand(2))->getZExtValue(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You could simplify the zero check and maybe move it beside the undef check
if (!V1.getOperand(0).isUndef() || V1.getConstantOperandVal(2) != 0)
return SDValue();There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
done
lukel97
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The PR could use a small description of the transform but otherwise LGTM
| ; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_llc_test_checks.py | ||
| ; RUN: llc -mtriple riscv64 -mattr=+v -riscv-v-vector-bits-min=512 -verify-machineinstrs < %s | FileCheck %s | ||
|
|
||
| define <16 x float> @test1(<8 x float> %0) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
InstCombine already flattens both of these tests. Do you have other examples?
define <16 x float> @test1(<8 x float> %0) {
entry:
%1 = shufflevector <8 x float> %0, <8 x float> poison, <16 x i32> <i32 0, i32 1, i32 2, i32 3, i32 4, i32 5, i32 6, i32 7, i32 0, i32 1, i32 2, i32 3, i32 4, i32 5, i32 6, i32 7>
ret <16 x float> %1
}
define <16 x i32> @test2(<4 x i32> %0) {
entry:
%1 = shufflevector <4 x i32> %0, <4 x i32> poison, <16 x i32> <i32 0, i32 1, i32 2, i32 3, i32 0, i32 1, i32 2, i32 3, i32 0, i32 1, i32 2, i32 3, i32 0, i32 1, i32 2, i32 3>
ret <16 x i32> %1
}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That is true. But I want to make sure INSERT_SUBVECTOR + VECTOR_SHUFFLE can be folded into CONCAT_VECTORS. SLP will generate the code like this.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
InstCombine should run after SLP. Do you have examples where InstCombine isn't cleaning it up? If you do, we should investigate InstCombine first.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No for now.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This also doesn't seem like a RISC-V specific optimization.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I was thinking that as well. It looks like GISel canonicalizes shuffles to concats: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69149
I didn't notice any codegen changes with this patch when building SPEC or the test suite so I presume that's InstCombine already taking care of this.
|
Close it since instcombine can solve this. |
No description provided.